Free Workplace Safety Culture Survey with certification and analysis

Have top managers ever considered the human factors that can endanger their operations?

Image by jcomp on Freepik

Leaders know that sometimes things will go wrong and unexpected problems will happen. They understand that their employees might make mistakes and they prepare them to fix and learn from these mistakes.

Photo by Jason Goodman on Unsplash

Top managers take workplace safety seriously and allocate appropriate resources to achieve that goal.

Safety-related issues are considered at high-level meetings on a regular basis, not just after some bad event.

Past events are thoroughly reviewed at top-level meetings and the lessons learned are implemented as global reforms rather than local repairs.

The main goal of top management after an accident is to identify and improve failed system defenses rather than trying to 
shift the blame to specific individuals.

Image by Peggy und Marco Lachmann-Anke from Pixabay

Top management takes a proactive stance on workplace safety. That is, do some or all of the following:

• Take steps to identify and remove recurring error traps. Strive to eliminate workplace and organizational factors that can cause errors.
• Brainstorming on new failure scenarios. 
• It also conducts regular "health checks" of organizational processes known to cause accidents.
  
  

  Photo by Isaac Smith on Unsplash

Top management recognizes that institutional factors that contribute to failure (lack of staff, inadequate equipment, lack of experience, incomplete training, poor human machine interfaces, etc.) are easier to manage and modify than short lived psychological states, such as distraction, inattention and forgetfulness.

It is understood that the effective management of safety, just like any other management process, depends critically on the collection, analysis and dissemination of relevant information.

Photo by Carlos Muza on Unsplash

Leaders know that it's important to use information about what has already happened (like near-misses and incidents) and information about what's happening now. This means looking at more than just audits, it means regularly checking different parts of the company (like planning, budgeting, funding, procedures, defenses, training, etc) to see what needs to be improved, and then taking action to make things better.

Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay

Meetings relating to safety are attended by staff from a wide variety of departments and levels.

Photo by Memento Media on Unsplash

Assignment to safety-related functions (EHS) is considered a shortcut to career growth rather than a dead end. Such functions are given appropriate positions and salaries.

Photo by Cytonn Photography on Unsplash

The company understands that sometimes making money and keeping people safe might not go together. They have a plan in place to clearly and openly figure out and fix these conflicts when they happen.

There are guidelines to encourage everyone to raise Safety-related  issues (one of the defining characteristics of a pathological culture is that messengers get "shot" and whistleblowers get fired or discredited).

Organization recognizes that safety management systems rely heavily on worker trust, especially with respect to reporting systems. A safe culture is created by people who feel comfortable reporting things, which can only happen if the company has a fair way of dealing with those report.

Photo by krakenimages on Unsplash

Company policies about reporting near-misses and incidents explain it's position on protecting people from punishment, keeping information private, and making sure the group that collects data is separate from the group that makes decisions about discipline.

The rules for punishing people for doing something wrong are based on what is considered good or bad behavior.
Everyone knows that some unsafe actions are done on purpose and should be punished, but most of these actions are not done on purpose. The important thing is not the action itself, but the reason behind it. If someone took an unnecessary risk or did something that would probably cause a mistake, then they should be held responsible, even if it was an accident.

The people in charge of different areas of the company encourage their workers to develop both practical and thinking skills to do their jobs safely and well. These thinking skills include thinking about things that could go wrong and planning how to handle them. This kind of thinking by both individuals and the company as a whole is a key part of systems that are very reliable, and is more than just practice with mock/ simulator checks.

Photo by Akson on Unsplash

Company has created ways for people to easily and quickly share information about safety, both after something happens and before. The goal is to make sure that the lessons learned can be used in other parts of the company.

Photo by Mimi Thian on Unsplash

The organization has the will and the resources to acknowledge its errors, to apologize for them and to reassure the victims (or their relatives) that the lessons learned from such accidents will help to prevent their recurrence.

Photo by Johan Godínez on Unsplash